-
Pronunciation: gu(a)-dalu-pe, guad(a)-lupe
-
Share your thoughts about Guadalupe
Infographic of Guadalupe name meaning, which is
Ask your friends & family about Guadalupe…
Guadalupe Name Popularity
How popular is the name Guadalupe? Here’s everything we know.
| Year |
Rank |
# Births |
% Births |
| 1910 |
293 |
35 |
0.0099% |
| 1911 |
376 |
23 |
0.0062% |
| 1912 |
408 |
50 |
0.0099% |
| 1913 |
431 |
61 |
0.0108% |
| 1914 |
435 |
82 |
0.0118% |
| 1915 |
495 |
88 |
0.0097% |
| 1916 |
492 |
96 |
0.0099% |
| 1917 |
547 |
78 |
0.0078% |
| 1918 |
537 |
90 |
0.0084% |
| 1919 |
438 |
142 |
0.0136% |
| 1920 |
418 |
161 |
0.0145% |
| 1921 |
423 |
167 |
0.0146% |
| 1922 |
379 |
214 |
0.0192% |
| 1923 |
399 |
185 |
0.0165% |
| 1924 |
406 |
188 |
0.0162% |
| 1925 |
384 |
204 |
0.018% |
| 1926 |
377 |
204 |
0.0185% |
| 1927 |
361 |
222 |
0.0201% |
| 1928 |
364 |
218 |
0.0204% |
| 1929 |
335 |
240 |
0.0232% |
| 1930 |
346 |
228 |
0.0218% |
| 1931 |
303 |
302 |
0.0306% |
| 1932 |
341 |
221 |
0.0224% |
| 1933 |
397 |
150 |
0.0161% |
| 1934 |
358 |
194 |
0.0201% |
| 1935 |
353 |
201 |
0.0207% |
| 1936 |
392 |
155 |
0.0161% |
| 1937 |
372 |
173 |
0.0176% |
| 1938 |
362 |
199 |
0.0194% |
| 1939 |
390 |
173 |
0.017% |
| 1940 |
383 |
184 |
0.0173% |
| 1941 |
389 |
183 |
0.0163% |
| 1942 |
412 |
180 |
0.0143% |
| 1943 |
349 |
270 |
0.0207% |
| 1944 |
318 |
319 |
0.0257% |
| 1945 |
319 |
305 |
0.025% |
| 1946 |
323 |
360 |
0.0244% |
| 1947 |
347 |
345 |
0.0207% |
| 1948 |
333 |
372 |
0.0233% |
| 1949 |
338 |
352 |
0.0219% |
| 1950 |
344 |
342 |
0.0212% |
| 1951 |
362 |
320 |
0.0189% |
| 1952 |
359 |
321 |
0.0184% |
| 1953 |
345 |
372 |
0.021% |
| 1954 |
373 |
322 |
0.0176% |
| 1955 |
398 |
290 |
0.0158% |
| 1956 |
429 |
271 |
0.0143% |
| 1957 |
456 |
241 |
0.0125% |
| 1958 |
437 |
280 |
0.0148% |
| 1959 |
478 |
230 |
0.0121% |
| 1960 |
492 |
216 |
0.0114% |
| 1961 |
477 |
234 |
0.0124% |
| 1962 |
503 |
208 |
0.0113% |
| 1963 |
514 |
200 |
0.0111% |
| 1964 |
486 |
228 |
0.013% |
| 1965 |
474 |
225 |
0.0138% |
| 1966 |
487 |
199 |
0.0127% |
| 1967 |
465 |
222 |
0.0146% |
| 1968 |
472 |
221 |
0.0147% |
| 1969 |
457 |
242 |
0.0157% |
| 1970 |
500 |
218 |
0.0137% |
| 1971 |
476 |
249 |
0.0166% |
| 1972 |
476 |
229 |
0.0168% |
| 1973 |
479 |
222 |
0.0171% |
| 1974 |
438 |
283 |
0.0218% |
| 1975 |
411 |
311 |
0.0242% |
| 1976 |
431 |
284 |
0.022% |
| 1977 |
448 |
274 |
0.0203% |
| 1978 |
454 |
269 |
0.02% |
| 1979 |
445 |
288 |
0.0204% |
| 1980 |
466 |
285 |
0.0195% |
| 1981 |
467 |
276 |
0.0188% |
| 1982 |
490 |
258 |
0.0173% |
| 1983 |
493 |
243 |
0.0165% |
| 1984 |
515 |
228 |
0.0153% |
| 1985 |
545 |
213 |
0.014% |
| 1986 |
509 |
253 |
0.0168% |
| 1987 |
565 |
213 |
0.014% |
| 1988 |
603 |
197 |
0.0126% |
| 1989 |
590 |
227 |
0.0141% |
| 1990 |
601 |
234 |
0.0141% |
| 1991 |
607 |
239 |
0.0147% |
| 1992 |
643 |
210 |
0.0132% |
| 1993 |
569 |
280 |
0.018% |
| 1994 |
608 |
243 |
0.0158% |
| 1995 |
625 |
223 |
0.0148% |
| 1996 |
634 |
224 |
0.015% |
| 1997 |
638 |
216 |
0.0146% |
| 1998 |
696 |
193 |
0.0129% |
| 1999 |
686 |
198 |
0.0132% |
| 2000 |
703 |
200 |
0.0131% |
| 2001 |
713 |
197 |
0.0131% |
| 2002 |
770 |
174 |
0.0116% |
| 2003 |
738 |
194 |
0.0128% |
| 2004 |
862 |
154 |
0.0101% |
| 2005 |
936 |
136 |
0.0089% |
| 2006 |
906 |
161 |
0.0103% |
| 2007 |
1,000 |
136 |
0.0086% |
| 2008 |
958 |
149 |
0.0096% |
| 2009 |
1,058 |
118 |
0.0079% |
| 2010 |
1,180 |
91 |
0.0063% |
| 2011 |
1,431 |
54 |
0.0038% |
| 2012 |
1,196 |
86 |
0.006% |
| 2013 |
1,465 |
48 |
0.0034% |
| 2014 |
1,475 |
49 |
0.0034% |
| 2015 |
1,657 |
35 |
0.0024% |
| 2016 |
1,600 |
39 |
0.0027% |
| 2017 |
1,666 |
32 |
0.0023% |
| 2018 |
1,546 |
41 |
0.003% |
| 2019 |
1,714 |
29 |
0.0021% |
| 2020 |
2,580 |
15 |
0.0012% |
| 2021 |
2,390 |
20 |
0.0016% |
| 2022 |
2,265 |
25 |
0.0019% |
| 2023 |
3,001 |
12 |
0.0009% |
Data via SSA.gov.